In early 2013, in his State of the Union address, President Obama urged the Congress to "guarantee that the next revolution in manufacturing is made in America." To that end, the President highlighted the central role of one revolutionary emerging technology. In his own words, "3D printing (that) has the potential to revolutionize the way we make almost everything." The President emphasized benefits from innovation in this promising field, alluding to the transformation of "a once-shuttered warehouse" in Youngstown, Ohio into the state-of-the-art National Additive Manufacturing Innovation Institute.
Referring to his proposed creation of a
network of manufacturing hubs, Obama insisted that there is no
reason why 3D printing innovation initiatives should not
spread around the entire nation. In fact, federal R&D tax
credits are available to assist companies willing to take part
in the imminent 3D printing revolution.
Enacted in 1981, the Federal Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit allows a credit of up to 13 percent of eligible spending for new and improved products and processes. Qualified research must meet the following four criteria:
Eligible costs include employee wages, cost
of supplies, cost of testing, contract research expenses, and
costs associated with developing a patent. On January 2, 2013,
President Obama signed the bill extending the R&D Tax
Credit for 2012 and 2013 tax years.
3D printing, or additive manufacturing, is the process of building three-dimensional objects from digital models. This is achieved through an additive technique, which consists in laying down successive layers of material. The process is clearly distinguishable from traditional machining techniques, which largely rely on subtractive methods (such as the removal of material through cutting or drilling). This revolutionary technology is based on three main principles:
Different 3D printing processes are available to process diverse materials. Examples include fused deposition modeling (FDM), used for thermoplastics, eutectic metals and edible materials; selective laser sintering (SLS), for thermoplastics, metal powders and ceramic powders; electron beam melting (EBM), used for titanium alloys; laminated object manufacturing (LOM), for paper, metal foil and plastic film; and stereolithography (SLA), applied to photopolymers.
The first crude 3D printer was invented about 30 years ago by Chuck Hull, co-founder of 3D Systems, a leading provider of 3D content-to-print solutions. Since its first rudimentary application, the technology has become indispensable to a number of industries. It was initially used in the production of prototypes, particularly in aerospace and automobile companies. With time, however, 3D printers evolved in capacity and ability to process different materials and that has allowed for its ever growing use in the creation of final products ranging from medical implants and footwear to jewelry.
The following table, originally published by Forbes Magazine, presents an interesting overview of industries with 3D printing applications, the readiness of the technology, and potential users (cross-segment uses are represented by arrows).
Even though progress has been made, there are still hurdles to clear before 3D printing is adopted into production manufacturing processes. Among the current challenges to existing technologies are the limited speed and volume at which objects can be printed and the high costs involved.
The revolutionary potential of 3D printing, however, is unquestionable. Many believe that this technology will change the world as we know it. Steve Faktor, founder of startup incubator IdeaFaktory, author of Econovation (Wiley, 2011), and former head of the American Express Chairman's Innovation Fund, compares 3D printing to the internet: "Just like the web revolutionized entertainment, shopping and communication, 3D printing will power a local and personal industrial revolution." Its effects on product availability, energy use, customization, and waste will transform the way industries function, from construction, sciences and medicine to art and, most clearly, manufacturing. Recent developments exemplify this revolutionary potential: early last year at Cornell University, researchers announced the development of 3D printed artificial ears that are practically identical to real ones, both in resemblance and functionality. Seimens recently announced that they will start printing spare parts for gas turbines, becoming one of the first global industrial manufacturers to routinely produce metal products using the innovative 3D technology. They will use 3D printing to speed up repairs and cut costs. In certain cases, they anticipate that the time taken to repair damage in turbine burners will be cut from 44 weeks to four. Although auto manufacturers have not started using 3D printing for mass manufacturing, they are using it for prototyping and potentially saving a tremendous amount of time and money in doing so. For example, an auto company can produce a prototype engine part that would usually take about four months and cost $500,000 in about four days for a cost of $3,000 using 3D printing.
The future of 3D printing looks even brighter as research advances in the development of a new, and less onerous, method to produce titanium, largely used in printers. According to a recent article from The Economist , Metalysis, a small British firm, has developed a promising process that uses electrolysis on powdered oxides, which would significantly reduce costs of 3D printing. The technology is expected to skyrocket with lower prices and foreign built printers in 2014 at the expiration of key patents. The technology currently covered by patent is the SLS technology, which is the lowest cost method of 3D printing.
In his recent book, "Makers, the New
Industrial Revolution", Chris Anderson highlights a
fundamental aspect of the 3D printing revolution, which he
denominates the emerging "Maker market." With access to
open-source design and 3D printing, entrepreneurs are engaging
in micro-manufacturing and creating a tsunami of highly
customized products, produced in small quantities and at
higher margins. The author points out that some of the
industrial giants of professional design and engineering are
shifting their focus to this emerging market. Autodesk, PTC,
and 3D Systems, for instance, have recently "released free
design software for amateurs and even kids, along with service
bureaus that let them upload their designs and have them 3D
printed or laser cut."
R&D expenses are increasing throughout the entire 3D vertical industry, ranging from the 3D printing manufacturers themselves to their end-user customers. While the increase in 3D design software availability is directly affecting small businesses and individuals, a wide range of product manufacturers are inserting 3D printing in their core businesses. The following table illustrates the recent exponential growth in R&D investment for two 3D printing industry leaders.
Proto Labs went public in early 2012 and in
late 2013 announced record revenues for their 3rd quarter; 29%
above the 3rd quarter for 2012. R&D spending was $9.1
million in 2012 and $8.4 million in the first three quarters
of 2013 alone. ExOne went public in early 2013 and has
announced it will invest its capital in innovative materials
for its 3D printing systems. In a marked difference from its
competitors, which focus both on the consumer and commercial
sides of 3D printing, ExOne concentrates solely on printers
for large industrial companies, such as aerospace and
automotive. In mid-2013, Statasys announced that they will be
acquiring desktop 3D printing company MakerBot in a deal worth
$604 million. They also later announced 116% in revenue growth
and that large companies such as UPS will begin selling 3D
printing services in some of their retail stores.
3D printing represents a unique opportunity to revamp the U.S. economics of manufacturing and restore the country's leading position as an innovator. The domestic production of such revolutionary printers is bound to boost revenue and job creation in the manufacturing sector. Additionally, the diffusion of such technology will significantly expand economic prospects for individuals and small businesses. Companies engaged in 3D printing R&D activities should take advantage of federal tax credits designed to accelerate the necessary breakthroughs that will open the way to a new future.
Gary Savell is a Systems Engineer with R&D Tax Savers.
Andressa Bonafé is a Tax Analyst with R&D Tax Savers.
Charles G Goulding is the Manager of R&D Tax Savers.
|The R&D Tax Credit Aspects of Mechatronics|
|The R&D Tax Credit Aspects of Driverless Cars|
|3D Printing - University Business Incubators and R&D Tax Credits|
|How 3D Printer Purchasers Earn Research and Development Tax Credits|
|Your First 3D Printer Purchase and R&D Tax Credits|
|New Tax Incentives for Lean 3D Printer Product Startups|
|Enhanced R&D Tax Credits for Specialized Co-Shared Spaces|
|The R&D Tax Credit Aspects of Boeing's Manufacturing Process and Supply Chain|
|The R&D Tax Credit Aspects of Chemical Engineering Post Dow-DuPont Merger|
|The R&D Tax Credit Aspects of LiDAR|
|The R&D Tax Credit Aspects of the Commercialization of Space|
|Bicycle Designers & Manufacturers Obtain R&D Tax Credits for Innovation|
|The R&D Tax Credit Aspects of Digital Art and Blockchain Technology|
|Machine Shop Innovation and R&D Tax Credits|
|The R&D Tax Credit Aspects of Design Firm Start-Ups|
|The R&D Tax Credit Aspects of NYC Start-Ups|
|The R&D Tax Credit Aspects of Domestic Fast Fashion|
|The R&D Tax Credit Aspects of Carbon Fiber|
|The R&D Tax Credit Aspects of 3D Printing End Users|
|The R&D Tax Aspects of 3D Printing Infrastructure|
|The R&D Tax Credit Aspects of 3D Printing for Textiles|
|Providing Business Tax & Accounting Advice for 3D Printer Purchase Decisions|
|The R&D Tax Credit Aspects of Solid State Lighting|
|The R&D Tax Credit Aspects of Modern Dental Labs|
|The R&D Tax Credit Aspects of STEM Building Design|
|Kickstarting Federal and State R&D Tax Credits|
|The R&D Tax Aspects of the Growing U.S. Water Shortage|
|The R&D Tax Aspects of the Baxter Robot|
|The R&D Tax Credit Aspects of Nanotechnology|
|National Innovation Priorities - How the 2014 Federal R&D Budget and R&D Tax Credits Integrate|
|The R&D Tax Credit Aspects of the Packaging Industry|
|The R&D Tax Credit Aspects of Ceramics|
|The R&D Tax Credit Aspects of the Plastic Manufacturing Industry|
|R&D Tax Credits for the High-Risk Battery Business|
|The R&D Tax Credit Aspects of Industrial Design|
|The R&D Tax Credit Aspects of a Nondysfunctional Airline Industry|
|The R&D Tax Credit Aspects of 3D Bioprinting|
|The R&D Tax Aspects of the U.S. Textile and Apparel Renaissance|
|The R&D Tax Aspects of Advanced Driver Assist Systems|
|R&D Tax Credit Aspects of Industrial Robotics|
|R&D Tax Credit Aspects of Service Robotics|
|R&D Tax Credit Opportunities for the Utility and Auto Industry's Common Needs|
|R&D Tax Credits for Increased U.S. Electric Utility Industry Innovation|
|Fast Growth of Sharing Economy Impacts Tax Reporting|
|The R&D Tax Credit Aspects of the Gun Manufacturing Industry|
|Process Improvement Research & Development Tax Credits|
|The R&D Tax Credit Aspects of Wearable Technology|
|How Lean New Business Startups and R&D Tax Credits Integrate|
|R&D Tax Credit Fundamentals|
|R&D Tax Credit Aspects of the U.S. Manufacturing Renaissance|
|The New Shape of R&D Tax Credits|
|New Car Fuel Rules Drive Product Innovation and R&D Tax Credits|
|R&D Credit Opportunity for Smart Sensors|
|The New R&D Tax Credit Scenario|